Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:25:34 +0100 | From | Tomas M <> | Subject | Re: max_loop limit |
| |
> You might want a more radical patch :
I agree that my patch is not the perfect solution for max_loop problem. But it nearly doubles max_loop for me (using 386 arch) and moreover it is a FIX for incorrect implementation in kernel IMHO. So I can see REASON to include it in Kernel. Do I cry at the correct tomb? :)
> > Instead of using : > :: > Switch to : > ::
I'm not any professional kernel hacker, so I don't understand the mysteries regarding ** (pointers to pointers?). Is there anyone who could provide CLEAN patch for loop.c, which would raise the max_loop limit to (at least) 1024 and which would be ACCEPTED to mainline kernel any soon?
I'm offering MONEY for this task. Let's say $256 ;-) I hope I didn't offend anyone by this offer.
Tomas M slax.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |