[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH RESEND 1/1] crypto API: RSA algorithm patch (kernel version
    > Assuming you have a secure kernel binary that is tamper proof, why do you need
    > slow and complex asymmetric encryption again? If you can write protect the kernel,
    > you can also read protect it (or let the boot loader pass the key to the kernel).
    > So what stops you from using a simple symmetric key cipher for signing?

    In symmetric cryptography you would give away your key if one could read the kernel binary
    while in assymetric one can only get the public key

    Protecting a TripleDES key in high security standards is not as simple as making the kernel read protected, you need a whole lot and
    that also means hardware (cryptomemories e.t.c)
    So you forget about all this overhead when you use assymetric

    Also this is the way this is done in all implementations ranging from Linux platforms (see DigSig@sourceforge for an example, or in
    Debian, Fedora) and in Microsoft platforms as far as i know

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-03-21 10:41    [W:0.022 / U:33.352 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site