lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] 2.6.21-rc4-mm1: freezing of processes broken
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:55:34 +0300 Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> wrote:

> On 03/21, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:45:16 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday, 21 March 2007 15:23, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Could the freezer code be trying to freeze the idle thread as a result?
> > > >
> > > > Yes. remove-the-likelypid-check-in-copy_process.patch make idle threads
> > > > visible to for_each_process/do_each_thread. Note also that idle threads
> > > > have ->mm != NULL. freezer, oom_kill, move_task_off_dead_cpu, etc, should
> > > > not see idle threads, but they do now.
> > >
> > > Well, I think this is a good enough reason for asking Andrew to drop this
> > > patch.
> >
> > Or we change the freezer to skip pid==0 tasks.
>
> I strongly disagree. In that case we should audit all users of for_each_process.
> Imho, this change is too dangerous. Actually, I personally think it is very good
> that idle threads are special and not visible, imho we should not change this.

OK, I'll tentatively drop remove-the-likelypid-check-in-copy_process.patch

> Btw. Rafael, Andrew, what about
>
> [PATCH] Make XFS workqueues nonfreezable
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=117270675922229
>
> , don't you think this should go to 2.6.21 ?
>

I've sent it to the XFS guys a couple of times, but their black hole is one
of the deeper ones.

David?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-21 18:13    [W:0.654 / U:0.380 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site