![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:11:31PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > >>I've got the patches in -mm now. I hope they will get merged when the >>the next window opens. >> >>I didn't submit the ->page_mkwrite conversion yet, because I didn't >>have any callers to look at. It is is slightly less trivial than for >>nopage and nopfn, so having David's block_page_mkwrite is helpful. > > > Yes. I was just wondering whether it makes more sense to do this > functionality directly ontop of ->fault instead of converting i over > real soon. I would personally prefer that, but I don't want to block David's patch from being merged if the ->fault patches do not get in next cycle. If the fault patches do make it in first, then yes we should do the page_mkwrite conversion before merging David's patch. I'll keep an eye on it, and try to do the right thing. Thanks, Nick -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-03-20 06:37 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||