[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: The performance and behaviour of the anti-fragmentation related patches
    On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote:

    > On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 02:22:56PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > > Opterons seem to be particularly prone to lock starvation where a cacheline
    > > gets captured in a single package for ever.
    > AIUI that phenomenon is universal to NUMA. Maybe it's time we
    > reexamined our locking algorithms in the light of fairness
    > considerations.

    This is a phenomenon that is usually addressed at the cache logic level.
    Its a hardware maturation issue. A certain package should not be allowed
    to hold onto a cacheline forever and other packages must have a mininum
    time when they can operate on that cacheline.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-03-03 04:19    [W:0.021 / U:402.148 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site