[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [ofa-general] Re: dst_ifdown breaks infiniband?
> Quoting Eric W. Biederman <>:
> Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: dst_ifdown breaks infiniband?
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <> writes:
> >> > Why is neighbour->dev changed here?
> >>
> >> It holds reference to device and prevents its destruction.
> >> If dst is held somewhere, we cannot destroy the device and deadlock
> >> while unregister.
> >
> > BTW, can this ever happen for the loopback device itself?
> > Is it ever unregistered?
> Well I don't think the loopback device is currently but as soon
> as we get network namespace support we will have multiple loopback
> devices and they will get unregistered when we remove the network
> namespace.

Hmm. Then the code moving dst->dev to point to the loopback
device will have to be fixed too. I'll post a patch a bit later.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-18 23:39    [W:0.062 / U:5.956 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site