lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] AF_RXRPC socket family implementation [try #2]
Date
On Mar 16, 2007, at 10:11:41, Alan Cox wrote:
>> I know what they are; and I don't think that what's available
>> covers it.
>>
>>> and use a proper standard socket type.
>>
>> Assuming that that list is exhaustive...
>
> SOCK_RDM seems to match perfectly well here. The point isn't to
> enumerate everything in the universe the point is to find "works
> like" parallels good enough to avoid more special casing.

IMHO the problem with classifying RxRPC as a "reliable datagram"
socket is that even an atomic unidirectional communication isn't a
single datagram, it's at least 3; there is shared connection state
and security context on both sides which pertains to a collection of
independent and possibly simultaneous RxRPC calls. From the digging
around that I did in the kernel socket code a while ago I don't see a
cleaner way of implementing it than a new SOCK_RXRPC.

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-18 07:35    [W:0.110 / U:1.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site