Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: is RSDL an "unfair" scheduler too? | From | Mike Galbraith <> | Date | Sun, 18 Mar 2007 07:26:11 +0100 |
| |
On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 06:24 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Maybe we're all discussing the problem because we have reached the point > where we need two types of schedulers : one for the desktop and one for > the servers. After all, this is already what is proposed with preempt, > it would make sense provided they share the same core and avoid ifdefs > or unused structure members. Maybe adding OPTIONAL unfairness to RSDL > would help some scenarios, but in any case it is important to retain > the default fairness it provides.
Bingo.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |