lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 17 Mar 2007 00:37:26 -0500
From"Mike Snitzer" <>
SubjectRe: forced umount?
On 3/16/07, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
> Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > Is this forced umount work even considered worthwhile by the greater
> > Linux community?  Is anyone actively working on this?
>
> Have a look at all the discussion about revoke/frevoke on lkml over the
> last week or two.

Thanks for the heads up; its good to see that Pekka Enberg's work has
continued.  I actually stumbled onto that line of work earlier while
searching for more info on Tigran Aivazian's forced unmount (badfs)
patches:
http://lwn.net/Articles/192632/

Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-17 06:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2008