lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: + remove-the-likelypid-check-in-copy_process.patch added to -mm tree
Date
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> writes:

> Yes! I meant we should change INIT_SIGNALS(), currently it does
>
> #define INIT_SIGNALS(sig) {
> ...
> .pgrp = 1,
> { .__session = 1},
>
> and this confuses (I think) set_special_pids(1,1) above. Because
> __set_special_pids() still deals with pid_t, not "struct pid".
>
> Unless I missed something, we should kill these 2 initializations
> above.

Got it. I agree we should initialize those fields to 0.

Sukadev you want to get that?

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-17 19:59    [W:0.043 / U:1.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site