[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/18] Make common x86 arch area for i386 and x86_64 - Take 2
    On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, David Miller wrote:

    > > It is primarily a performance improvement since the sparsemem table
    > > lookups would no longer be necessary and it also streamlines other
    > > frequent cacheline uses. These page -> page_struct and vice versa
    > > operations are key to the performance of various subsystem among them
    > > the slab allocator.
    > If you set the bit range small enough and don't use sparsemem-extreme,
    > the cost is extremely low considering the flexibility you obtain.

    What flexibility?

    > There are always going to be holes on large systems, there isn't
    > really a way to avoid this given how addressing is done on those
    > machines.

    Virtual mmap allows holes in the same way as page tables do. These
    structures were designed for sparseness. I really do not think we should
    rediscuss the material here that was discussed on linux-mm. The outcome of
    that was that we will introduce virtual memmap to reduce sparsemem
    overhead and to increase flexibility.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-03-16 21:55    [W:0.021 / U:3.320 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site