lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 16 Mar 2007 09:29:08 +0200 (EET)
FromPekka J Enberg <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] revoke: misc fixes
Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> > 	/*
> > - 	 * Not holding ->mmap_sem here.
> > + 	 * Not holding ->mmap_sem here but we must watch out for page
> > + 	 * faults and after the shared mappings have been taken down
> > + 	 * and sys_mmap() trying to remap the revoked range.
> >   */
> >   vma->vm_flags |= VM_REVOKED;
> >   smp_mb();
> > @@ -455,7 +457,7 @@ 	int err = 0;

On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
> You're still modifying vm_flags without down_write mmap_sem, so this will
> corrupt vm_flags.

Uhm, you're right, two concurrent writes and we can lose some bits so a 
barrier doesn't work. Too bad as we're under mapping->i_mmap_lock here and 
thus cannot take ->mmap_sep...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-16 08:31    [from the cache]
©2003-2008