[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/18] Make common x86 arch area for i386 and x86_64 - Take 2
    On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 12:47 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
    > On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 17:06 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
    > > Well I just see a lot of pain from these patches but I doubt
    > > they will avoid any bugs. If people don't compile test both
    > > archs they will always likely break on another. There are lots
    > > of subtle dependencies that are not expressed in the pathname
    > > even after this intrusive operation (e.g. in the includes).


    > With the proposed patch set, what can break i386 by modifying something
    > in arch/x86_64, or what can break x86_64 by modifying something in
    > arch/i386? (not counting the unfinished pci shared code).

    Oops, sorry, you did say "in the includes". Yeah, that holds the same
    crap that I'm talking about.

    $ cat include/asm-i386/stacktrace.h
    #include <asm-x86_64/stacktrace.h>

    Which isn't something that I would like to stay either. So it's just
    something else that needs to be fixed. Not something that will
    circumvent what the current patch set is trying to do.

    -- Steve

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-03-15 18:01    [W:0.020 / U:8.348 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site