[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/18] Make common x86 arch area for i386 and x86_64 - Take 2

On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> That's created at build time. But I don't see anywhere in a freshly
> cloned repo or fresh untar of the linux tarball, where there exists any
> symbolic links.

There are none.

Symlinks embedded in the source tree tend to be hard to maintain: you can
traditionally not send patches to add/change/move/remove them, and not
everybody can even import them at all (ie some people have been so damaged
by CVS that they maintain their kernels in it - I'm trying my best to be a
humanitarian and rid the world of the scourge that is CVS, but I'm not
sure I can undo the untold mental damage wrought by it over decades of
quiet suffering).

With git, you can track symlinks and send them as patches, but we've not
really had a huge reason to do so. They are easy enough to generate from
Makefiles if required, and quite often you don't really need to anyway (ie
the "symlink" is often just a make rule, like the

SRCDIR := ../../../i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq

line I quoted earlier).

So I'd rather not even start using symlinks unless there is some really
good reason. We can continue to just use Makefiles.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-14 18:55    [W:0.092 / U:59.740 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site