Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:15:45 +1300 | From | Sam Vilain <> | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy! |
| |
Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 10:56:43AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > >> What's wrong with that? >> > > I had been asking around on "what is the fundamental unit of res mgmt > for vservers" and the answer I got (from Herbert) was "all tasks that are > in the same pid namespace". From what you are saying above, it seems to > be that there is no such "fundamental" unit. It can be a random mixture > of tasks (taken across vservers) whose resource consumption needs to be > controlled. Is that correct? >
Sure, for instance, all postgres processes across all servers might be put in a different IO and buffercache use container by the system administrator.
Sam.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |