Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:08:33 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2 |
| |
* Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> The test scenario was one any desktop user might do with every > expectation responsiveness of the interactive application remain > intact. I understand the concepts here Con, and I'm not knocking your > scheduler. I find it to be a step forward on the one hand, but a step > backward on the other.
ok, then that step backward needs to be fixed.
> > We are getting good interactive response with a fair scheduler yet > > you seem intent on overloading it to find fault with it. > > I'm not trying to find fault, I'm TESTING AND REPORTING. Was.
Con, could you please take Mike's report of this regression seriously and address it? Thanks,
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |