[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Style Question
    On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 22:15 +0800, Cong WANG wrote:
    > Another question is about NULL. AFAIK, in user space, using NULL is
    > better than directly using 0 in C. In kernel, I know it used its own
    > NULL, which may be defined as ((void*)0),

    Userspace has the usually same definition.

    > but it's _still_ different
    > from raw zero.

    It is different that "0" as such has the type "int". But this int is
    automatically promoted to a "0 pointer".

    > So can I say using NULL is better than 0 in kernel?

    Yes, because it is immediately clear that a pointer is (or should be)
    there (and not an int).
    And the same holds for userspace since this is a pure C question.

    Firmix Software GmbH
    mobil: +43 664 4416156 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
    Embedded Linux Development and Services

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-03-11 15:25    [W:0.030 / U:16.148 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site