lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [git patches] libata fixes
Date
Hello,

> It seems like IRQ is not getting through. The first IRQ
> driven command is failing for you.

Hmmmm....
> Extract is :
> ata7: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x0000000000019c00 ctl 0x0000000000019882 bmdma
> 0x0000000000019400 irq 16
> ata8: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x0000000000019800 ctl 0x0000000000019482 bmdma
> 0x0000000000019408 irq 16
IRQ 16 is IO-APIC-fasteoi for libata, and is not shared... but all the
others libata IRQ are IO-APIC-edge.

> * Does giving 'acpi=off' or 'irqpoll' make any difference?
>
> * Can you connect a harddisk to the channel and see whether
> that works?
Tried that.. Disk is identified as ATA-7: Mastor 6Y080L0, YAR41BW0, max
UDMA/13
and then timeout again...

Tried then with acpi=off, same result (identify is OK, but then timeout),
and irqpoll and then it was OK !!!!
Let's then go back to my DVD-RW and test irqpoll...
and ... Yes.... Got it !
It is identified, it can be mounted, and read as /dev/sr1 !
/proc/interrupts show a count of 0 for IRQ 16, so yes, it goes somewhere
else...

Doing some diffs on copy of /proc/interrupts while accessing the DVD
gives two possibilities : IRQ14 or IRQ18, but both are also counting
when not accessing the DVD...

Question : does running with irqpoll affects performance ?

Paul


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-11 12:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans