Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:11:50 +0100 | From | Willy Tarreau <> | Subject | Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.28 for 2.6.20 |
| |
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 04:56:57PM -0500, michael chang wrote: > On 3/10/07, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote: > >BTW, Con, I think that you should base your work on 2.6.20.[23] and not > >2.6.20 next time, due to this conflict. It will get wider adoption. ^^^^^^^^^^
> Maybe I'm naive, but I find this hard to understand -- 2.6.20.2 didn't > exist when Con published his patch. (Con published it ~12 hours before > the release of 2.6.20.2, from what I can tell.) How can he base his > work on something that didn't yet exist? (And it applied cleanly to > 2.6.20.1, the latest when he published it.)
You see the words I have underlined ? "next time". I know for sure he published it before 2.6.20.2, but now that it is out, I suggested that Con rebases his work on this version for new releases.
Regards, Willy
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |