[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] rcfs core patch
    On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 10:31:26AM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
    > we've already had some trouble with nsproxy holding things with
    > different lifetimes. As it happens the solution this time was to put
    > the pid namespace where it belongs - not in nsproxy - so maybe moving
    > this info into nsproxies will be fine, it just rings a warning bell.

    nsproxy seems the best place to me to hang off the resource control
    objects (nsproxy->ctlr_data[]). These objects provide information like
    resource limit etc required by the resource controllers.

    Alternately we could move them to task_struct which would cause unnecessary
    duplication of pointers (and wastage of space).

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-03-01 17:49    [W:0.032 / U:46.916 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site