lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
    From
    Date
    Hi.

    On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 03:42 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
    > On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 08:57:49AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
    >
    > > Can we start to NAK new drivers that don't have proper power management
    > > implemented? There really is no excuse for writing a new driver and not
    > > putting .suspend and .resume methods in anymore, is there?
    >
    > The PCI layer is able to deal with drivers that have no PM methods in
    > the most simple case.

    Yeah. I suppose we could use a pm_safe bit flag in struct device_driver
    and/or struct pci_driver. I have other things to do right now, but will
    seek to understand the relationship between those structs better later.

    Regards,

    Nigel

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-02-10 05:45    [W:0.039 / U:0.568 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site