![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 08:57 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. > > I don't think this is already done (feel free to correct me if I'm > wrong).. > > Can we start to NAK new drivers that don't have proper power management > implemented? There really is no excuse for writing a new driver and not > putting .suspend and .resume methods in anymore, is there? to a large degree, a device driver that doesn't suspend is better than no device driver at all, right? now.. if you want to make the core warn about it, that's very fair - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-02-09 23:19 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||