lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 8 Feb 2007 09:04:08 +0100
SubjectRe: search-a-little-harder-for-mkimage.patch
FromOleg Verych <>
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 02:40:28AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
[] 
> by this argument, why does mkuboot.sh exist at all then ?  let's
> simply delete mkuboot.sh and change all arch Makefile's like so:
> -    $(CONFIG_SHELL) $(MKIMAGE) ...
> +    -mkimage ...

Yes (with TOOLCHAIN prefix).

> i of course prefer the existing solution: call the mkuboot.sh script
> which checks for a few variations of the `mkimage` binary and if it
> does not exist, output a friendly message

so as `make' will, but better than patched "friendly message", which
doesn't reflect: neither change to toolchain prefix, nor possible
permission problems, or what ever it can be, preventing actual running
the command ;)

____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-08 07:57    [W:0.171 / U:0.130 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans