lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] rcutorture: Remove redundant assignment to cur_ops in for loop
Josh Triplett wrote:
> The for loop in rcutorture_init uses the condition
> cur_ops = torture_ops[i], cur_ops
> but then makes the same assignment to cur_ops inside the loop. Remove the
> redundant assignment inside the loop, and remove now-unnecessary braces.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@kernel.org>
> ---
> kernel/rcutorture.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcutorture.c
> index 0c7bf0c..7258bcb 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutorture.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutorture.c
> @@ -875,12 +875,9 @@ rcu_torture_init(void)
>
> /* Process args and tell the world that the torturer is on the job. */
>
> - for (i = 0; cur_ops = torture_ops[i], cur_ops; i++) {
> - cur_ops = torture_ops[i];
> - if (strcmp(torture_type, cur_ops->name) == 0) {
> + for (i = 0; cur_ops = torture_ops[i], cur_ops; i++)
>
May be tired right now, but wouldn't it be more logical with:

for (i = 0; cur_ops = torture_ops[i], i++)

Right now it seems to have two conditions for cur_ops.


Just my 2cent
Richard Knutsson


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-08 01:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site