lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Missing critical phys_to_virt in lib/swiotlb.c
On 2/6/2007 8:56 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> > From: David Moore <dcm@acm.org>
...
>> > It fixes real crashes:
>> > http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-bugs/2006-12/msg02943.html
>> > http://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=28224
>> > http://www.pchdtv.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2063&sid=a959a14a4c2db0eebaab7b0df56103ce
>> >
>> > --- linux-2.6.19.x86_64/lib/swiotlb.c.orig 2007-02-04 13:18:41.000000000 -0500
>> > +++ linux-2.6.19.x86_64/lib/swiotlb.c 2007-02-04 13:19:43.000000000 -0500
>> > @@ -750,7 +750,7 @@ swiotlb_sync_sg(struct device *hwdev, st
>> >
>> > for (i = 0; i < nelems; i++, sg++)
>> > if (sg->dma_address != SG_ENT_PHYS_ADDRESS(sg))
>> > - sync_single(hwdev, (void *) sg->dma_address,
>> > + sync_single(hwdev, phys_to_virt(sg->dma_address),
>> > sg->dma_length, dir, target);
>> > }
...
> Sounds weird. If this really didn't work much more should be broken
> (e.g. no cdroms/sound on Intel x86-64 boxes with >4GB)

Yes, it's weird; e.g. it seems that reports of that on linux1394-user
and -devel came in only recently. But I may have missed something.
(OTOH, this bug was partially hidden for FireWire users because one of
the relevant FireWire drivers was lacking respective _sync_sg calls.)

> I'm a little sceptical. Perhaps the TV driver is doing something bogus
> here?

sync_single() definitely wants a virtual address there. sg->dma_address
is a physical address. The bug and the fix are obvious.

Unfortunately an author of lib/swiotlb.c chose to call many variables
holding *virtual* addresses "dma_addr". Note how that file at the same
time contains variables like "dma_addr_t dma_handle". A recipe for disaster.

> Also I haven't heard of this problem before at all and I'm sure I would
> have if sounds/cdroms were broken.
>
> Shouldn't be applied without further analysis.

Maybe some recent changes elsewhere cause more frequent use of
swiotlb-driven bounce buffers? That should be verified.

Or maybe people are deploying affected hardware more often now?
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== --=- --==-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-06 10:03    [W:0.046 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site