lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

    * Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote:

    > On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 23:56 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    >
    > > changing the current 'timer' entry (which is line 2 of /proc/interrupts)
    > > to be 'listed as lapic-timer' and to 'replace it with the count from
    > > LOC' is faking a count in a line where nothing like that should be.
    >
    > This point is getting irrelevant ..

    it is very much relevant: faking a count is something we /dont/ want to
    do with /proc/interrupts, for (very) basic compatibility, simplicity and
    policy reasons. And that is precisely what your suggestion was to
    'solve' this supposed 'problem' - so it's very much relevant.

    > > the kernel simply displays reality: IRQ#0 isnt increasing because
    > > it's not used, and LOC (local apic timers) is increasing.
    >
    > What about the statistics for the other interrupts in the system ? It
    > clearly doesn't list all interrupts in the system .

    what is your point?

    Ingo
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-02-07 00:17    [W:0.023 / U:0.524 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site