[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2 of 4] Introduce i386 fibril scheduling
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007, Zach Brown wrote:

> > The 'pool' of kernel threads doesnt even have to be per-task, it can be
> > a natural per-CPU thing
> Yeah, absolutely.

Hmmm, so we issue an async sys_read(), what a get_file(fd) will return for
a per-CPU kthread executing such syscall? Unless we teach context_switch()
to do a inherit-trick for "files" (even in that case, it won't work if
we switch from another context). And, is it all for it?
IMO it's got to be either a per-process thread pool or a fibril approach.
Or we need some sort of enter_context()/leave_context() (adopt mm, files,
...) to have a per-CPU kthread to be able to execute the syscall from the
async() caller context. Hmmm?

- Davide

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-05 19:55    [W:0.410 / U:1.692 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site