lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Problem with freezable workqueues
Date
On Wednesday, 28 February 2007 20:32, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 02/28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > --- workqueue.c.org 2007-02-28 18:32:48.000000000 +0530
> > > +++ workqueue.c 2007-02-28 18:44:23.000000000 +0530
> > > @@ -718,6 +718,8 @@ static void cleanup_workqueue_thread(str
> > > insert_wq_barrier(cwq, &barr, 1);
> > > cwq->should_stop = 1;
> > > alive = 1;
> > > + if (frozen(cwq->thread))
> > > + thaw(cwq->thread);
> > > }
> > > spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
> >
> > Unfortunately, the above code is mm-only. Is the analogous fix for 2.6.21-rc2
> > viable?
>
> I am sorry, I lost track of this problem. As for 2.6.21, create_freezeable_workqueue
> doesn't work and conflict with suspend. Why can't we remove it from XFS as you
> suggested before?

Yes, we can (preparing a patch). I was just curious. :-)

Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-28 20:43    [W:0.623 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site