Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 24 Feb 2007 17:30:11 +0100 | Subject | Re: ioctls.h (Re: [PATCH][RFC] Make asm-generic/ioctl.h extensible by adding conditionals.) | From | Oleg Verych <> |
| |
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:59:42AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Oleg Verych wrote: > > > > From: "Robert P. J. Day" > > > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel > > > Subject: [PATCH][RFC] Make asm-generic/ioctl.h extensible by adding conditionals. > > > Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 06:45:20 -0500 (EST) > > > > > as a followup to my earlier post, is it worth making this change > > > to allow at least a couple arch-specific ioctl.h files to be > > > massively simplified? > > > > And i wonder, why there is no generic ioctls.h, hm? > > beats me, but it seems that there are a *number* of arch-specific > header files that could be treated this way -- a single generic file, > allowing the small number of customizations that seem to be necessary > across all architectures. > > but i figured i'd start with ioctl.h first and see where it went from > there.
Indeed.
Thank you!
> -- > ======================================================================== > Robert P. J. Day > Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry > Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA > > http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page > ======================================================================== ____ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |