lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 24 Feb 2007 08:04:09 +0100
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: [patch 04/13] syslets: core code
* Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> wrote:

> > +asmlinkage long
> > +sys_threadlet_on(unsigned long restore_stack,
> > +		 unsigned long restore_eip,
> > +		 struct async_head_user __user *ahu)

> > +asmlinkage long sys_threadlet_off(void)

> If we have a new syscall that does the exec, we can save the two 
> on/off calls.

the on/off calls are shaped in a way that makes them ultimately 
vsyscall-able - the kernel only needs to know about the fact that we are 
in a threadlet (so that the scheduler can do its special 
push-head-to-another-context thing) - and this can be signalled via a 
small user-space-side info structure as well, put into the TLS.

> [...] Also, the complete_thread() thingy can be done automatically 
> from inside the kernel upon function return, by hence making the 
> threadlet function look like a normal thread function:

yeah - and that's how it works in my current codebase already, 
threadlet_off() takes a 'completion event' pointer as well, and the ahu. 
I'll release v4 so that you can have a look.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-24 08:13    [from the cache]
©2003-2008