![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:57:38PM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote: | On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:53:22 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote: | | > | > -static struct workqueue_struct *status_queue; | > | > +static struct workqueue_struct *status_queue = NULL; | | > | You better drop this part. Someone is bound to object. | | > actually I don't understand why... Event on ftdi_elan_exit() | > status_queue is setting up to NULL. And what is bound to object? | > Could you write more detailed? | | All these variables are static, they are already initialized to zero. | | -- Pete | Pete, I may be wrong, but a lot of the kernel code have static pointers initialized to NULL with explicit manner... More over I always thought that _static_ is not mean _initialized to zero_. I think _static_ is just the method to _hide_ variables in the file (as ANSI C describes). Am I wrong? Cyrill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-02-23 08:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||