[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 10/13] KVM: Wire up hypercall handlers to a central arch-independent location
    Joerg Roedel wrote:
    > On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 02:17:54AM -0800, Dor Laor wrote:
    >> I have Ingo's network PV hypercalls to commit in my piplien.
    >> Till then we can just add the test hypercall:
    >> case __NR_hypercall_test:
    >> printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s __NR_hypercall_test\n",
    >> __FUNCTION__);
    >> ret = 0x5a5a;
    >> break;
    >> default:
    >> BUG();
    > Is it a good idea to call BUG() on an undefined hypercall? I assume its
    > better to inform the guest that is has issued an illegal call...

    The code returns -KVM_EINVAL if the hypercall is not handled (and BUG()
    on the host as a response to something controlled by a guest is not a
    good idea).

    error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-02-22 11:41    [W:0.019 / U:1.664 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site