lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 10/13] KVM: Wire up hypercall handlers to a central arch-independent location
    On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 02:17:54AM -0800, Dor Laor wrote:
    > I have Ingo's network PV hypercalls to commit in my piplien.
    > Till then we can just add the test hypercall:
    > case __NR_hypercall_test:
    > printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s __NR_hypercall_test\n",
    > __FUNCTION__);
    > ret = 0x5a5a;
    > break;
    > default:
    > BUG();

    Is it a good idea to call BUG() on an undefined hypercall? I assume its
    better to inform the guest that is has issued an illegal call...

    Joerg

    --
    Joerg Roedel
    Operating System Research Center
    AMD Saxony LLC & Co. KG


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-02-22 11:25    [W:0.026 / U:89.316 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site