Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:24:10 +0000 | From | jose.goncalves@inov ... | Subject | Re: Serial related oops |
| |
Quoting Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 03:07:18PM +0000, Jose Goncalves wrote: >> Russell King wrote: >> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 04:34:15PM -0800, Michael K. Edwards wrote: >> > >> >> Are you using an unpatched gcc 4.1.1? Its optimizer did nasty things >> >> to us, at least on an ARM target ... >> >> >> > >> > That's ruled out. Please think about it for a moment - serial_in() >> > managed to work correctly most of the time, and then spontaneously >> > changes its well-defined ABI behaviour in a way that analysis of the >> > asm doesn't allow it to. >> > >> >> I'm using gcc 3.4.6. >> But I agree with Russell, if it was such a problem it would hit on the >> first iteration of my application and not after 1 day of executing the >> same piece of code... > > One thing you might think about is running memtest86 on the machine > for the same kind of time interval, just in case it's something trivial > like bad ram. >
OK. That's another thing to do.
Meanwhile I've switched to another SBC and I'm now running my application on the new unit. Lets wait and see...
José Gonçalves
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |