lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH(Experimental) 2/4] Revert changes to workqueue.c
On 02/20, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 12:59:28AM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > Before you begin. You are doing CPU_DOWN_PREPARE after freeze_processes().
> > Not good. This makes impossible to do flush_workueue() at CPU_DOWN_PREPARE
> > stage, we have callers.
>
> We have few solutions to deal with this:
>
> a. Mark such workqueues not freezable for hotplug
> b. If above is not possible, don't call flush_workqueue in DOWN_PREPARE
> c. If above is not possible, send DOWN_PREPARE before freeze_processes()
>
> I would prefer a solution in the above order listed.
>
> Which caller are you referring to here? Maybe we can decide on the
> option after we see the users of flush_workqueue() in DOWN_PREPARE.

mm/slab.c:cpuup_callback()

> > I'm afraid it won't be so easy to solve all locking/racing problems. Will
> > wait for the patch :)
>
> I dont see problems for workqueue.c even if we follow option c. Do you
> see any?

I don't right now... Oh, I already forgot everything :) I'll try to recall
when I see the patch.

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-20 21:13    [W:0.114 / U:0.276 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site