Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 02 Feb 2007 21:03:48 -0500 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.20-rc7: known regressions |
| |
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 06:49:16 +0100 > Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote: > >> This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc7 compared to 2.6.19 >> that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree. > > There are still a few things hanging around. > > I have these queued: > > aio-fix-buggy-put_ioctx-call-in-aio_complete-v2.patch > kexec-avoid-migration-of-already-disabled-irqs-ia64.patch > net-smc911x-match-up-spin-lock-unlock.patch > rtc-pcf8563-detect-polarity-of-century-bit-automatically.patch > alpha-fix-epoll-syscall-enumerations.patch > revert-blockdev-direct-io-back-to-2619-version.patch > scsi-sd-udev-accessing-an-uninitialized-scsi_disk-results-in-a-crash.patch > altix-more-acpi-prt-support.patch
Would you forward the x86-64 dma_noncoherent API build fix I posted? Anything that uses that API won't build on x86-64 without my [simple and obvious] patch.
> - I have r8169-fix-a-race-between-pci-probe-and-dev_open.patch floating > about, but I forget its status.
I posted a preferred patch (which someone then noted need to use setup_timer), and am waiting for an "it works" response of some sort
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |