[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6.20-ck1
Andrew Morton writes:

> On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 08:00:06 +1100 Con Kolivas <> wrote:
>> On Sunday 18 February 2007 05:45, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>> ...
>> > But the one I like, mm-filesize_dependant_lru_cache_add.patch,
>> > has an on-off switch.
>> >
>> ...
>> Do you still want this patch for mainline?...
> Don't think so. The problems I see are:
> - It's a system-wide knob. In many situations this will do the wrong
> thing. Controlling pagecache should be per-process.
> - Its heuristics for working out when to invalidate the pagecache will be
> too much for some situations and too little for others.
> - Whatever we do, there will be some applications in some situations
> which are hurt badly by changes like this: they'll do heaps of extra IO.
> Generally, the penalties for getting this stuff wrong are very very high:
> orders of magnitude slowdowns in the right situations. Which I suspect
> will make any system-wide knob ultimately unsuccessful.

Rest assured I wasn't interested in pushing this patch for mainline anyway.

-ck users can also rest assured about this patch for the following reasons:

- The usage pattern on a desktop will guarantee that this patch helps 99.9%
of the time rather than hurts. Therefore, this feature is enabled by default
on -ck.

- With the usage pattern on a server of any sort, it will be unknown whether
this patch helps or harms. Therefore, this feature is disabled by default on


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-18 01:43    [W:0.036 / U:6.476 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site