Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 17 Feb 2007 13:45:08 -0500 | From | Chuck Ebbert <> | Subject | Re: [ck] Re: 2.6.20-ck1 |
| |
Con Kolivas wrote: > Maintainers are far too busy off testing code for > 16+ cpus, petabytes of disk storage and so on to try it for themselves. Plus > they worry incessantly that my patches may harm those precious machines' > performance... >
But the one I like, mm-filesize_dependant_lru_cache_add.patch, has an on-off switch.
In other words it adds an option to do things differently. How could that possibly affect any workload if that option isn't enabled?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |