[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/6] MODSIGN: Kernel module signing
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:14:53 PST, Andreas Gruenbacher said:
    > I agree, that's really what should happen. We solve this by marking modules as
    > supported, partner supported, or unsupported, but in an "insecure" way, so
    > partners and users could try to fake the support status of a module and/or
    > remove status flags from Oopses, and cryptography wouldn't save us.

    Where cryptography *can* save you is that a partner or user can't fake a
    'Suse Supported' signature without access to the Suse private key.
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-02-15 21:37    [W:0.054 / U:10.016 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site