[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 9/11] Panic delay fix
> We'd have to audit and figure out what udelays are for hardware and
> which are not, but the evidence is that the vast majority of them are
> for hardware and not needed for virtualization.

Which is irrelevant since the hardware drivers won't be used in a
virtualised environment with any kind of performance optimisation.

> Changing udelay to "hardware_udelay" or something all over the kernel
> would have delayed the paravirt_ops merge by an infinite amount 8)

paravirt_ops has no business fiddling with udelay. Not only does it
create more code bloat and stalls in relatively fast paths but its
optimising the wrong thing anyway.

My performance sucks -> optimise out udelay is the wrong approach. My
performance sucks, switch to the virtual block driver is the right
approach, and a virtual block driver won't be using udelay anyway

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-14 13:41    [W:0.139 / U:5.392 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site