Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:54:23 -0500 | From | Jeff Dike <> | Subject | Re: x86_64: fix 2.6.18 regression - PTRACE_OLDSETOPTIONS should be accepted |
| |
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 03:34:23AM +0100, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso wrote: > Index: linux-2.6.git/arch/x86_64/ia32/ptrace32.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.git.orig/arch/x86_64/ia32/ptrace32.c > +++ linux-2.6.git/arch/x86_64/ia32/ptrace32.c > @@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys32_ptrace(long reques > case PTRACE_SINGLESTEP: > case PTRACE_DETACH: > case PTRACE_SYSCALL: > + case PTRACE_OLDSETOPTIONS: > case PTRACE_SETOPTIONS: > case PTRACE_SET_THREAD_AREA: > case PTRACE_GET_THREAD_AREA: >
I sent an equivalent patch in earlier today:
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86_64/ia32/ptrace32.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86_64/ia32/ptrace32.c +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86_64/ia32/ptrace32.c @@ -239,6 +239,8 @@ asmlinkage long sys32_ptrace(long reques __u32 val; switch (request) { + case PTRACE_OLDSETOPTIONS: + request = PTRACE_SETOPTIONS; case PTRACE_TRACEME: case PTRACE_ATTACH: case PTRACE_KILL: I change the request so that PTRACE_OLDSETOPTIONS doesn't need to propogate any further. However, it is present in include/asm-x86_64, so I guess that counts as being part of the x86_64 ABI. That being the case, I guess my patch can be dropped in favor of this one.
Jeff
-- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |