Messages in this thread | | | From | Andreas Gruenbacher <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Fix d_path for lazy unmounts | Date | Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:39:40 -0800 |
| |
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 07:37, Linus Torvalds wrote: > We could prepend another '/' (so that you'd have a path that starts with > "//"). That's still a legal path, but it's also somethign that even POSIX > says is valid to mean something else (eg "//ftp/.." or "//socket/.." to > escape into another namespace).
This sounds good enough to me. My main point is that users that care should be able to tell the difference.
Thanks, Andreas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |