[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD
    On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:25:27AM +0000, Alan wrote:
    > > So where is the difference between SATA-I and SATA-II ?
    > All physical side if they are on the same controller when you do the
    > tests. Mostly latency,

    SATA-II is a highly confusing marketing term. It is /not/ a technical

    In some cases there are NO differences between SATA-I and SATA-II. You
    can find 1.5Gbps non-NCQ-supporting devices claiming SATA-II.

    Similarly, there is no "SATA version" word in the IDENTIFY DEVICE page,
    like there are "ATA version" words.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-02-13 18:15    [W:0.018 / U:77.760 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site