![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > It's a kmap_atomic() debugging patch which I wrote ages ago and whcih > Ingo sucked into his tree. I don't _think_ this warning is present in > your tree at all. > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/29/157 is where it starts. > > I had a lenghty back-and-forth with Christoph on this within the past > couple of months and I cannot locate the thread and I don't recall > what the upshot was and Christoph is still offline. > > Knocking out __GFP_ZERO at the point where the slab allocator(s) call > the page allocator seems like a good approach to me. > > But I don't think we need to do anything for 2.6.24.. ok - Rafael, please strike this off the regressions list, there is no problem in .24 other than the double memset for some SLOB metadata. Ingo | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-12-09 09:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||