lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 8 Dec 2007 21:15:44 -0500
FromTheodore Tso <>
SubjectRe: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:30:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, 8 of December 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > However, as far as I am concerned, Ingo's patch, first posted to LKML
> > here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/16/66 should be listed as fixing
> > the above regression.  Rafael, could you please make a note of this in
> > your regression list,
> 
> Done, thanks.

Great, thanks.  I should add that technically this wasn't a regression
since I had been seeing this since before 2.6.23.  Also, it isn't a
big deal, since aside from noise in the syslog, falling back to
polling more doesn't make any functional or user-visible difference
(although I guess it's less efficient).  

Regardless of whether it is a regression, it would be nice to get the
patch applied and and this issue fixed for 2.6.25!

					- Ted


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-12-09 03:19    [from the cache]
©2003-2008