![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:30:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Saturday, 8 of December 2007, Theodore Tso wrote: > > However, as far as I am concerned, Ingo's patch, first posted to LKML > > here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/16/66 should be listed as fixing > > the above regression. Rafael, could you please make a note of this in > > your regression list, > > Done, thanks. Great, thanks. I should add that technically this wasn't a regression since I had been seeing this since before 2.6.23. Also, it isn't a big deal, since aside from noise in the syslog, falling back to polling more doesn't make any functional or user-visible difference (although I guess it's less efficient). Regardless of whether it is a regression, it would be nice to get the patch applied and and this issue fixed for 2.6.25! - Ted | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-12-09 03:19 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||