lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.24-rc3-git4 NFS crossmnt regression
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:51:58 -0500
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> wrote:

>
> On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 14:39 -0500, Shane wrote:
> > On Dec 7, 2007 2:16 PM, Shane <gnome42@gmail.com> wrote:
> > ...
> > > Confirmed working in rc4-git5. I'll deploy this kernel in a few more
> > > spots and check for other regressions.
> >
> > Hmm, I installed a new kernel built from the same sources on the NFS
> > server. And now I don't see anything at all in the crossmnt dirs.
> >
> > ls /dirA/dirB/dirC --> zero output (empty dir)
> >
> > Are there any other pending fixes?
> >
> > Shane
>
> You've probably fallen afoul of
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9504
>

Yeah.

I have a tentative fix below but I can't seem to get Eric and Denis to get
a suitable fix nailed down. It's urgent!



From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>

/proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc dentry disappeared during d_revalidate.
d_revalidate only dentries from shadowed one and below.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9504

Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Marcus Better <marcus@better.se>
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Cc: Marcus Better <marcus@better.se>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/proc/generic.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/proc/generic.c~lost-content-of-proc-sys-fs-binfmt_misc fs/proc/generic.c
--- a/fs/proc/generic.c~lost-content-of-proc-sys-fs-binfmt_misc
+++ a/fs/proc/generic.c
@@ -380,12 +380,17 @@ static int proc_revalidate_dentry(struct
return 0;
}

-static struct dentry_operations proc_dentry_operations =
+static struct dentry_operations proc_dentry_shadow_operations =
{
.d_delete = proc_delete_dentry,
.d_revalidate = proc_revalidate_dentry,
};

+static struct dentry_operations proc_dentry_operations =
+{
+ .d_delete = proc_delete_dentry,
+};
+
/*
* Don't create negative dentries here, return -ENOENT by hand
* instead.
@@ -394,6 +399,7 @@ struct dentry *proc_lookup(struct inode
{
struct inode *inode = NULL;
struct proc_dir_entry * de;
+ int use_shadow = 0;
int error = -ENOENT;

lock_kernel();
@@ -406,8 +412,10 @@ struct dentry *proc_lookup(struct inode
if (!memcmp(dentry->d_name.name, de->name, de->namelen)) {
unsigned int ino;

- if (de->shadow_proc)
+ if (de->shadow_proc) {
de = de->shadow_proc(current, de);
+ use_shadow = 1;
+ }
ino = de->low_ino;
de_get(de);
spin_unlock(&proc_subdir_lock);
@@ -423,6 +431,8 @@ struct dentry *proc_lookup(struct inode

if (inode) {
dentry->d_op = &proc_dentry_operations;
+ dentry->d_op = use_shadow ?
+ &proc_dentry_shadow_operations : dentry->d_parent->d_op;
d_add(dentry, inode);
return NULL;
}
_


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-12-08 00:17    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans