lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 7 Dec 2007 18:57:54 +0100
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] scheduler: fix x86 regression in native_sched_clock
* Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@yahoo.fr> wrote:

> Le Fri, 7 Dec 2007 15:54:18 +0100,
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> a écrit :
> 
> > This is a version that 
> > is supposed fix all known aspects of TSC and frequency-change 
> > weirdnesses.
> 
> Tested it with frequency changes, the clock is as smooth as I like it
> :-)

ok, great :-)

> The only remaining sched_clock user in need of conversion seems to be 
> lockdep.

yeah - for CONFIG_LOCKSTAT - but that needs to be done even more 
carefully, due to rq->lock being lockdep-checked. We can perhaps try a 
lock-less cpu_clock() version - other CPUs are not supposed to update 
rq->clock.

> Great work.

thanks. I do get the impression that most of this can/should wait until 
2.6.25. The patches look quite dangerous.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-12-07 18:01    [W:0.698 / U:0.090 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans