[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: solid state drive access and context switching
> > Maybe I'm missing something but I don't see it.  We want a block
> > interface for these devices, we just need a faster slimmer interface.
> > Maybe a new mtdblock interface that doesn't do erase would be the
> > place for?
> Doesn't do erase? MTD has to learn almost all tricks from the block
> layer, as devices are becoming high-latency high-bandwidth, compared to
> what MTD was designed for. In order to get any decent performance, we
> need asynchronous operations, request queues and caching.
> The only useful advantage MTD does have over block devices is an
> _explicit_ erase operation. Did you mean "doesn't do _implicit_ erase".

You're right. That the point I was trying to make, albeit badly, MTD
isn't the place for this. The fact that more and more of what the MTD
is being used for looks a lot like the block layer is a whole
different discussion.

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-12-05 01:07    [W:0.063 / U:1.592 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site