Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:12:35 -0500 | | From | Jeff Garzik <> | | Subject | Re: 2.6.24-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 |
| |
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Saturday 01 December 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> Subject : 2.6.24-rc1: pata_amd fails to detect 80-pin wire >> Submitter : "Thomas Lindroth" <thomas.lindroth@gmail.com> >> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/7/152 >> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9322 >> Handled-By : Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> >> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> >> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/11/115 > > Tejun's rework of cable detection code which fixes the problem has > been just applied into "upstream" (not "upstream-fixes") so it is > destined for 2.6.25 (I wasn't on cc: BTW) and since I got no feedback > on my patch (below) which also happens to fix the regression, was > acked by Alan, tested by Thomas and has been in -mm for 3 weeks now > I assume that everybody is happy with it (Jeff/Tejun: you were also > on cc: when the patch was merged into -mm)... > > Linus, please apply. > > [PATCH] pata_amd/pata_via: de-couple programming of PIO/MWDMA and UDMA timings > > * Don't program UDMA timings when programming PIO or MWDMA modes. > > This has also a nice side-effect of fixing regression added by commit > 681c80b5d96076f447e8101ac4325c82d8dce508 ("libata: correct handling of > SRST reset sequences") (->set_piomode method for PIO0 is called before > ->cable_detect method which checks UDMA timings to get the cable type). > > * Bump driver version. > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> > Tested-by: "Thomas Lindroth" <thomas.lindroth@gmail.com> > Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> > Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> > Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
applied #upstream-fixes
|  |