Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:47:47 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86: kprobes change kprobe_handler flow |
| |
* Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com> wrote:
> And also, I prefer "return 1" to "{ret = 1; goto out;}" for > simplicity.
it seems that the code already uses 'ret', and sets it to 1 in certain cases - in that light it's a tiny bit cleaner to just have a single return code flow.
Ingo
| |